Woody Allen and Soon-Yi Previn Call HBO Docuseries a ‘Shoddy Hit Piece’

Shortly after the premiere of the primary episode of “Allen v. Farrow,” an HBO documentary sequence that re-examines Dylan Farrow’s decades-old sexual abuse allegations towards the filmmaker Woody Allen, her adoptive father, a spokesperson for Mr. Allen launched a assertion on Sunday night time slamming the sequence, calling it a “shoddy hit piece.”Letty Aronson, Mr. Allen’s sister, despatched the assertion — attributed to a spokesperson — shortly after the primary episode aired, on behalf of Mr. Allen and Soon-Yi Previn, the filmmaker’s spouse and the adopted daughter of Mia Farrow. In 1992, Ms. Farrow, Mr. Allen’s longtime girlfriend, realized of the connection between Mr. Allen and Ms. Previn when Ms. Previn was a first-year school pupil. That relationship can also be the topic of scrutiny within the four-part docuseries.Neither Mr. Allen nor Ms. Previn participated within the sequence, nevertheless it does embrace audio excerpts from Mr. Allen’s current memoir, “Apropos of Nothing.”“These documentarians had little interest in the reality,” the assertion mentioned. “Instead, they spent years surreptitiously collaborating with the Farrows and their enablers to place collectively a hatchet job riddled with falsehoods.”Episode 1 contains intensive interviews with Mia Farrow and Dylan Farrow, who accused Mr. Allen of sexual assault when she was 7 years old. It additionally included interviews with household and buddies who mentioned that even earlier than Aug. 4, 1992 — the day that Dylan Farrow says Mr. Allen assaulted her — they witnessed habits from Mr. Allen towards his daughter that they noticed as inappropriate.Mr. Allen has lengthy denied the abuse allegations, arguing that Mia Farrow had coached Dylan to make the allegations after studying about his relationship with Ms. Previn.In Sunday’s assertion, Mr. Allen continued to disclaim the claims.“As has been identified for many years, these allegations are categorically false,” the assertion mentioned. “Multiple businesses investigated them on the time and discovered that, no matter Dylan Farrow could have been led to imagine, completely no abuse had ever taken place.”In later episodes, the sequence raises questions on a kind of investigations, particularly: a report issued by the Yale Child Sexual Abuse Clinic, on the Yale-New Haven Hospital, which discovered Dylan uncredible after interviewing the kid 9 occasions throughout a seven-month interval. According to the sequence, all of the contemporaneous interview notes from these classes have been destroyed when the ultimate report was issued.Prosecutors in Connecticut, the place Dylan Farrow says that Mr. Allen sexually assaulted her, declined to prosecute Mr. Allen in 1993. The state’s legal professional mentioned that he did so to spare Dylan the trauma of a trial however that he believed she had been molested.The assertion mentioned that Mr. Allen and Ms. Previn have been approached concerning the documentary lower than two months in the past and have been “given solely a matter of days” to reply to it. It additionally mentioned it was “sadly unsurprising” that HBO was airing the sequence, contemplating a manufacturing deal it had made with Ronan Farrow, Dylan Farrow’s brother, who has spoken in help of his sister, together with within the sequence. (Mr. Farrow, an investigative journalist who has reported extensively on sexual misconduct, has a take care of HBO to create investigative documentary specials, although he was not on the manufacturing staff for “Allen v. Farrow.”)Spokespeople for the documentary and HBO didn’t instantly reply to a request for touch upon Monday.
This article was first revealed on website

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here